| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: strange network slowness in 2.6 unless pingflooding |
| From: | CaT <cat@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:50:37 +1000 |
| Cc: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040927161845.1442bb4a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organisation: | Furball Inc. |
| References: | <20040927090342.GA1794@xxxxxxxxxx> <41587A26.6020606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040927224957.GA1043@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040927161845.1442bb4a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 04:18:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> In particular, if there are hubs or switches involved on
> your local network that might be getting the duplex wrong,
> or some NAT or firewall machines in the path in question,
> please specify their setup precisely.
>
> Otherwise there is zero chance of this problem ever being
> fixes.
Well I was going to do a few more tests and send a nice email doing just
that but in going through my package list with dpkg I spotted cpudyn and
cpufreqd installed. I've uninstalled them and now I cannot reproduce
the problem.
As such, and I hope I'm not speaking to you, it appears 'solved'. They
must've been interfering with the network layer somehow (or something)
and now that they are gone all's well.
My apologies if anyones time was wasted.
--
Red herrings strewn hither and yon.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tons of "BUG: dst overflow ..." messages, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline; generic 802.11 stack, Vladimir Kondratiev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: strange network slowness in 2.6 unless pingflooding, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6] neighbour cache statistics like rt_stat, Harald Welte |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |