| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:10:09 -0700 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1093799632.1073.410.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <1093799632.1073.410.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:13 -0400, jamal wrote: > > The requeue event is useful in finding out when a device is overloaded > on the egress (bus or bandwidth). > Atached patch introduces this. I would have used the overlimit bits > but at the moment thats being used for different semantical reasons. > I have not done extensive testing on it. > > Opinions welcome - If all is good, Dave please apply. Dave, what happened to this? I put the stuff into iproute2 but the requeue stat never made it into 2.6. Is it a bad idea? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch 2.6.9-rc2] 3c59x: do not mask reset of aism logic at rmmod, John W. Linville |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |