oops. sorry about that. dave, please apply the following patch.
thanks!
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2004/09/23 12:24:28-04:00 chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# [ATM]: [lanai] get sleep interval right
#
# drivers/atm/lanai.c
# 2004/09/23 12:24:12-04:00 chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 -1
# [ATM]: [lanai] get sleep interval right
#
diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
--- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-23 12:25:36 -04:00
+++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-23 12:25:36 -04:00
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
break;
}
- msleep(4);
+ msleep(40);
}
/* 15.2.2 - clear out all tx registers */
cardvcc_write(lvcc, 0, vcc_txreadptr);
In message <20040923160710.GB1699@xxxxxxxxxx>,Nishanth Aravamudan writes:
>On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:29:19PM -0400, chas williams (contractor) wrote:
>
><snip>
>> diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
>> --- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
>> +++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
>> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
>> DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
>> break;
>> }
>> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 25);
>> + msleep(4);
>
>Somehow this got changed for msleep(40); to msleep(4); !! :) The patch I
>sent on 15 September had msleep(40); in it, at least. If you could make
>the change in your bk, that would be great!
>
>-Nish
>
|