netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (

To: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>)
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:07:10 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:29:19PM -0400, chas williams (contractor) wrote:

<snip>
> diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
> --- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c     2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> +++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c     2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
>                       DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
>                       break;
>               }
> -             schedule_timeout(HZ / 25);
> +             msleep(4);

Somehow this got changed for msleep(40); to msleep(4); !! :) The patch I
sent on 15 September had msleep(40); in it, at least. If you could make
the change in your bk, that would be great!

-Nish

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>