| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 22 Sep 2004 08:08:40 -0400 |
| Cc: | Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040922045239.GA19573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <414DF11C.1080505@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040919215915.GB9573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095633569.1047.107.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040919231734.GA10124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095647944.1046.206.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040920025802.GA11567@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095683660.1047.254.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <414F1E12.6010808@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922000503.GA13218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4150E7E5.2000001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040922045239.GA19573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 00:52, Herbert Xu wrote: > Congestion control similar to the way dumping works may work for you. Note the initial goal was to have dump work for large tables and a simple get for a basic table row. Since netlink is being used for a lot of things now, it may be time to obsolete those assumptions. Note also, theres a lot of wastage of that scarce sock buffer via page sized skbs - its not as trivial to fix, but would go some way to improve overrunning of the socket. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, Steven Blake |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun6to4 to become free., David Woodhouse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |