netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures
From: Steven Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:38:58 -0400
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1095764621.1049.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040918203319.24004d6e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095645106.1048.190.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040919195351.0b3560e6.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095686672.1049.301.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040920121123.70baf895.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921034212.GA28462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040920231805.3f18479c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921090423.GE8058@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921093252.GA32545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095764621.1049.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 07:03, jamal wrote:

> Important for marketing to be able to claim _full_ RFC 1812 compliance.
> Kepp the TOS!
> I know it sounds silly, but there are a lot more foolish people out
> there addicted to glossyware.

RFC 1812 was written before TOS routes were pulled out of OSPFv2 (due to
too fee independent implementations).  No one implements FIB lookup as
described in RFC 1812 in the core.  What people do implement is PBR, as
well as DSCP-based nexthop selection for MPLS DIFF-TE (RFC 3564).


Regards,

// Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>