| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:18:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040921034212.GA28462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040918203319.24004d6e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095645106.1048.190.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040919195351.0b3560e6.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095686672.1049.301.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040920121123.70baf895.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040921034212.GA28462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:42:12 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:11:23PM +0000, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > I believe I was successful in preserving existing behavior, but > > I wonder if it makes sense any longer. CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS > > changes not one data structure. It does exactly: > > Yes CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS has out-lived its usefulness. It has > always seemed half-hearted compared to CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK. Ok, then I'm gonna nuke it. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun6to4 to become free., Andre Tomt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH + RFC] neighbour/ARP cache scalability, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |