| To: | Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: The ultimate TOE design |
| From: | Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:51:29 -0700 |
| Cc: | Paul Jakma <paul@xxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4148A561.5070401@xxxxxxxxxx>; from nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:26:09PM -0400 |
| References: | <4148991B.9050200@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409152102050.23011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4148A561.5070401@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:26:09PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > IBM's PowerNP chip was also very simmilar (a powerpc core with lots of > hardware assists for DMA and packet inspection in the extended register > area). Don't know if they still sell it, but at one time I had heard > they had booted linux on it. Well, yes, PowerNP support has been in the kernel for years and embedded Linux distros like Mvista support them. It's no longer an IBM chip, though. AMCC purchased the PPC4xx network processors (PowerNP) from IBM and later purchased the entire standard SoC PPC4xx product line from IBM. That is, except for the PPC4xx STB chips like are found in the Hauppage MediaMVP, IBM retained those. AMCC pretty much owns all the PPC4xx line and PowerNP 405H/L are still available. -Matt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: The ultimate TOE design, Leonid Grossman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, Neil Horman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, Deepak Saxena |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |