| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x - include/net/neighbour.h spell-check |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:17:50 -0700 |
| Cc: | speattle@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040913162724.7a6f2213.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <20040913174842.96183.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040913162724.7a6f2213.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:27:24 -0700 David S. Miller wrote: | On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:48:39 -0700 (PDT) | S P <speattle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: | | > in linux 2.6.x.x kernel's include/net/neighbour.h | > 'Neighbour' and 'Neighbor' are used interchangeably. | > | > neighbour is british variation of neighbor, so i'd say | > neighbor is more appropriate. but then the header's | > named neighbour. | | Does anyone remember what happened on linux-kernel when | the similar case of American English "color" vs. British | English "colour" was being debated? | | In any event, whatever we decide we should do tree-wide. I don't recall any mass changes from -our to -or. -- ~Randy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: The ultimate TOE design, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: The ultimate TOE design, Leonid Grossman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x - include/net/neighbour.h spell-check, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |