| To: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 Sep 2004 10:46:14 -0400 |
| Cc: | Linux NICS <linux.nics@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040915140222.GD1274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20040915081439.GA27038@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <414808F3.70104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095250706.1057.214.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040915140222.GD1274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 10:02, Harald Welte wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:18:27AM -0400, jamal wrote: > > > Our friends in FreeBSD claim they can do 1Mpps _forwarding_ with > > e1000 - forget about transmit only ;-> > > IMHO that was a 82547, attached to CSA and not PCI-X... I thought PCI-X should have less overhead in this case (because it has split-transaction capability), no? What do you mean by above statement of it not being PCI-X? cheers, jama |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: generic 802.11 stack, greg chesson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546, Harald Welte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |