netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] BSD Jail LSM

To: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BSD Jail LSM
From: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:20:05 -0500
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1095072996.14355.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1094847705.2188.94.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1094847787.2188.101.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1094844708.18107.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040912233342.GA12097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095072996.14355.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 05:56, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2004-09-13 at 00:33, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Right now one must choose between either an ipv4 or ipv6 interface.
> > Is typical ipv6 usage such that it would be preferable to be able to
> > specify one of each?  
> 
> Its normal to have both yes.

The attached version supports simultaneous ipv4 and ipv6 addresses. 
(Though only one of each)

Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: jail.diff
Description: Text Data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>