| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: iproute2 patch introducing mtu/txqlen/weight via rtnetlink |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 10 Sep 2004 09:16:46 -0400 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI "Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040910024030.28b7c66c@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <20040909164834.GB18994@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040909103344.5a448b01.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040909175411.GB19155@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040910.103341.28767986.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040910092948.GB19930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040910024030.28b7c66c@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 05:40, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Unless there is some compelling reason, I think that keeping the old ioctl > interface for a least a year until the kernel changes become more ubiquitous. I think that iproute2 should first attempt to use netlink and on failure switch to ioctls. Maybe Thomas can create such a patch. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3C900-COMBO lan minor problem, xavier.droubay@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: iproute2 patch introducing mtu/txqlen/weight via rtnetlink, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: iproute2 patch introducing mtu/txqlen/weight via rtnetlink, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |