| To: | Margit Schubert-While <margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 8/8] prism54/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() |
| From: | maximilian attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:24:33 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kj <kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200409020850.38177.margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Margit Schubert-While <margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kj <kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200409020850.38177.margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004, Margit Schubert-While wrote: > I agree with Jean and add the following : > You are assuming HZ = 1000. > In 2.4, HZ = 100 (And in 2.6, HZ is not necessarily = 1000). shure, but this is an argument for msleep as it uses msecs as unit, which don't depend on your arch. (well physics says different for arch/relativistic :) > The prism54 code base is identical between 2.4/2.6 and is > maintained as such in the project. > Therefore, I look forward to your implementation of msleep() > in 2.4 ;-) 2.4 is closed for such stuff, you'll know that better than me, it shouldn't hinder 2.6 in it's progression. one day you will need to branch. -- maks kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 8/8] prism54/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), Margit Schubert-While |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 8/8] prism54/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), Margit Schubert-While |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 8/8] prism54/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), Margit Schubert-While |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 8/8] prism54/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), Nishanth Aravamudan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |