[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:57:08 -0700
Cc: dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, okir@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4132303C.2060807@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <412A8FB5.4080700@xxxxxxxxx> <OFE08A3DF5.09BCA1C4-ON88256EFA.00806C05-88256EFA.0080E98F@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040828231529.051a73cc.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4132303C.2060807@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:36:28 +0200
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> David S. Miller wrote:
> >I think I agree with David now that I've read through this a few
> >times.  Can someone send me a patch which does this?
> >  
> >
> Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new
> fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the
> hook in unregistered.

While we're doing this, is your patch similar to one of the two
original ones that Olaf Kirch posted?  I want to give him proper
attribution, in whatever form is reasonable, that's all.

> >Does 2.4.x have this problem too?  I thought it didn't.
> >  
> >
> I'll have a look, but I think it does.

Thanks a lot for helping out with this Patrick.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>