netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

should that bugfix wait till 2.6.9? {was Re: Big set of networking updat

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: should that bugfix wait till 2.6.9? {was Re: Big set of networking updates}
From: sandr8 <sandr8_NOSPAM_@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:57:58 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040818173736.7ad8e58a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040818173736.7ad8e58a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
David S. Miller wrote:

ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2004-08-15 19:33:16-07:00, kaber@xxxxxxxxx
 [PKT_SCHED]: cacheline-align qdisc data in qdisc_create()
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>

net/sched/sch_api.c |   21 +++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
i was just going to send a similar changeset, since i didn't see any discussion so far about that... this changeset fixes a bug that is in 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.8 as well. today i fixed it on my own too, since it was messing up a lot of things... the handling of the private data belonging to a qdisc was inconsistent. the memory allocated was not the memory used and hence its content could change. even worst what happened with a qdisc that had a pointer in its private data... god knows what was going on... isn't it urgent that people patch their kernel? is it possible for them to wait till 2.6.9? i had oops regarding ext3 before finding and repairing that bug!
cheers
Alessandro

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>