| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] XFRM: ICMP{,v6} type/code support (Take 2) (was Re: [PATCH][IPSEC] IPsec policy can be matched by ICMP type and code) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:24:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040818.230936.59708655.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040809175404.301bd60a@localhost> <20040809170705.6ab75c5f.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040818.230936.59708655.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:09:36 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Truly %100 RAW sockets should have their packets untouched by > > the kernel. User wants exactly that packet to be sent onto > > the wire. > > Here's the updated version of the patch. > Changesets are available at: > <bk://bk.skbuff.net:20609/linux-2.6-xfrm-icmp/>. Pulled, thanks Yoshifuji. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Call xfrm6_rcv in xfrm6_tunnel_rcv, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Big set of networking updates, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] XFRM: ICMP{,v6} type/code support (Take 2) (was Re: [PATCH][IPSEC] IPsec policy can be matched by ICMP type and code), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | strange e1000 interface freeze, P |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |