| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:17:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | jiva@xxxxxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040816180350.780e4912.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <BD428BAA.4BBE%jiva@xxxxxxxxxxx> <E1BwINn-0000ZX-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815112548.GA2864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815195313.31bacf13.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040817004141.GA18789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040816180350.780e4912.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:03:50PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:41:41 +1000 > Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So maybe we should keep the numbers? > > If we take out the names, won't this break xfrm_user apps > that currently can receive them? I mean that we should keep the numbers internally. So xfrm_user.c will translate the names given by existing applications into numbers as the patch that you've just applied does. We can then create a new NETLINK payload type that uses numbers if we wish. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |