Re: cvs commit'ed

[mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Luis R. Rodriguez)]

On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 02:37:12PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 07:22:42PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 August 2004 03:53, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Denis,
> > >
> > > Actually you have CVS access to prism54, if no one complains about these
> > > patches (and I think no one will as they are trivial), just go ahead and
> > > commit these changes yourself. Please remember to update the ChangeLog 
> > > too.
> > >
> > > After your changes go through I plan on starting to integrate the wpa work
> > > I have (it can't wait any longer).
> > 
> > I did it. You may want to check whether cvs is still ok,
> > it was the first time I ever used cvs ;]
> 
> Heh, I'm sure its fine. BTW I'd like us to move to subversion to use the
> concepts of patchsets. I think this will help us keep our tree and the
> kernel tree in sync.

I just checked to make sure and CVS rep is fine. The updates weren't
going through to generate patches published online since the latest
kernel was just released -- 2.6.8. I DLed, and now patches are going
through.

        Luis

-- 
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84  A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E