[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ipw2100 wireless driver

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ipw2100 wireless driver
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:27:04 +0200
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Chua <jeffchua@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <411A5D3B.3010808@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040714114135.GA25175@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407141947270.27995@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040714115523.GC2269@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040809201556.GB9677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408101258130.1290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040810075558.A14154@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040810101640.GF9034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040810113439.A15100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040811121735.GA31171@xxxxxxxxxx> <411A5D3B.3010808@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

> >Hmm, strange, one merge in last 8 weeks. That's not too active
> >project. Are you sure this is the right tree to work against?
> It's the right tree, but wireless development hasn't coalesced yet on 
> that tree it appears.  It sounds like the Intel folks are interested 
> in working on that tree, and others have mentioned they are 
> interested as well.

Is there way to access that tree without bk? Daily patches maybe?
64 bytes from icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>