| To: | Masahide Nakamura <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][IPSEC] IPsec policy can be matched by ICMP type and code |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:07:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040809175404.301bd60a@localhost> |
| References: | <20040809175404.301bd60a@localhost> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:54:04 +0900 Masahide Nakamura <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thinking of raw socket (in outbound case), the patch supports only > ICMP; it is out of scope such packet as user-land builds non-ICMP data > (e.g. TCP/UDP) and sends through raw socket. IMO this behavior is > enough, however does anybody have comments? Truly %100 RAW sockets should have their packets untouched by the kernel. User wants exactly that packet to be sent onto the wire. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: Disable local bh's when grabing qdisc_tree_lock in tc_dump_tfilter, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][IPSEC] IPsec policy can be matched by ICMP type and code, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][IPSEC] IPsec policy can be matched by ICMP type and code, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][IPSEC] IPsec policy can be matched by ICMP type and code, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |