Re: [PFKEY] spirange should be in host byte order

netdev

Re: [PFKEY] spirange should be in host byte order

To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PFKEY] spirange should be in host byte order
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:51:26 -0700
Cc:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20040731100444.GA17201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20040731100444.GA17201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:04:44 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So the conclusion is that we can and should change our PFKEY
> implementation to use host order for these fields.

I agree with this conclusion and have applied your patch.
Good thing we caught this now.

Thanks Herbert.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PFKEY] spirange should be in host byte order, Herbert Xu Re: [PFKEY] spirange should be in host byte order, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [IPSEC] xfrm_alloc_spi always succeeds on non-trivial range, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [IPSEC PATCH] missing break in UDP decap code Re: (udp-en/decap broken in 2.6.8-rc2?) Re: ipsec, nat-t, iproute2?, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PFKEY] spirange should be in host byte order, Herbert Xu
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]