| To: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH]Fix adding SA through netlink(xfrm_user) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:07:28 -0700 |
| Cc: | nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Xine.LNX.4.44.0407281134500.11200-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040729001058.48cd1791@localhost> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0407281134500.11200-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:41:33 -0400 (EDT) James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Masahide Nakamura wrote: > > > When adding IPsec SA with PF_KEY (pfkey_add()), > > xfrm_probe_algs() is called to make all algorithms valid. > > However, it is missing to call it with netlink (xfrm_user) case and > > it causes xfrm_aalg_get_byname() return NULL even if the name of > > algorithm seems to be correct. > > Looks ok, but odd that this has not been picked up before. As discovered, this never got picked up before mostly because the most popular user of xfrm_user (Openswan) is still using PF_KEY to probe the algorithms. Patch applied, arigato Masahide-san. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] kill rtnl_exlock stubs, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [IPV6] Misc. Trivial Patches, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]Fix adding SA through netlink(xfrm_user), James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH]Fix adding SA through netlink(xfrm_user), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |