| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pkt_cls.h incompatiables |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:33:23 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, arekm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1090675993.1161.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20040723135945.7f50b02c.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1090630154.1134.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1090675993.1161.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello. In article <1090675993.1161.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at 24 Jul 2004 09:33:52 -0400), jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > Makes the performance counters a separate TLV - a little bit of a pain, > but acceptable given its optional. > Compiles but hasnt been tested; user space code will have to change. basically, looks fine. 1. is it okay to use unsigned long? I'd rather prefer __u32 or __u64. 2. please use kcnts[0] instead of kcnts[] because user probably want to do sizeof(struct tc_u32_pcnt) > I dont want to touch the policer for now. hmm. :-P Thanks. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | kernel bug at sched.c:564! + linux kernel 2.4.25, Niranjan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6 SCTP updates, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] pkt_cls.h incompatiables, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] pkt_cls.h incompatiables, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |