| To: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 13 Jul 2004 06:42:55 -0400 |
| Cc: | Weiguang Shi <wgshi2002@xxxxxxxx>, netdev linux <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1112.63.170.215.71.1089689819.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <1089686376.1044.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040713030312.50570.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112.63.170.215.71.1089689819.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 23:36, shemminger@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > What are the reasons for creating netem instead of using NIST Net? > > To be brutally honest, because NISTnet is mess and would never > make it into the mainline kernel as it stands. Violently agree (as someone who attempted this). I am actualy not sure its even properly maintained anymore. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Problem of Race Condition in IKE implementation on linux system., Pranav |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 and encapsulation headers, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support., shemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support., David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |