| To: | Vladimir Kondratiev <vkondra@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ethernet QoS support? |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 12 Jul 2004 22:36:50 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1089685567.1046.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <1C440F3C-D110-11D8-8B61-000393DBC2E8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200407092126.43021.vkondra@xxxxxxx> <1089634701.1055.260.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200407122107.29389.vkondra@xxxxxxx> <1089685567.1046.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 22:26, jamal wrote:
> If you have 8 priorities then priority 7 would be the highest in
> IEEE speak (i.e most important) but priority 0 would be the one
> considered most important for IEEE.
that ^^^^ should be IETF.
cheers,
jamal
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ethernet QoS support?, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support., jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ethernet QoS support?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ethernet QoS support?, Kumar Gala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |