| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Jul 2004 17:11:39 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040707135831.4c98dd51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <20040701113312.43cfe6c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040702134437.5891e998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1088824432.1043.271.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040707111055.32ebb25b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089226667.1027.411.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040707135831.4c98dd51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 16:58, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > TBF works but since the sender (on the same local machine) may go over > it's allocation, it will drop packets. As should any queue that gets congested. > For example, if I use tbf to simulate a slow 33k bits/sec link then > TCP test never > completes, it just hangs! TBF does work for intermediate sizes. > > But if I use the pacing simulation it works. I am not sure i follow; is this because of the return code from the enqueue? cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i_ino, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/ipmr.c fixes, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |