netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: analysis of TCP window size issues still around - several reports /

To: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: analysis of TCP window size issues still around - several reports / SACK involved?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:31:22 -0700
Cc: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, alessandro.suardi@xxxxxxxxxx, phyprabab@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040706202708.GA1385@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <32886.63.170.215.71.1088564087.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040629222751.392f0a82.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040630152750.2d01ca51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040630153049.3ca25b76.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040701133738.301b9e46@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040701140406.62dfbc2a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040702013225.GA24707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706093503.GA8147@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706131955.3a3c6c8b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040706202708.GA1385@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:27:08 +0200
bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 01:19:55PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> > What would be more interesting is to get the tcpdump trace from the
> > other side of this connection.  This is crucial, as it will show how
> > and in what way exactly the window scale options and/or window fields
> > are being edited by a firewall or other device and thus causing
> > the problems.
> 
> I have an appointment with Alessandro tomorrow evening at 11PM CEST to do
> just that.

That's great, thanks a lot.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>