Oh and PS, all this should be discussed on netdev, CC prism54-devel. I
forgot to include netdev in the thread in my reply.
Luis
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote:
> > Aurelien scribeth:
> > > I've checked the changes in CVS and I disagree with the patch #5
> > (removing the writes to some pci registers).
> > > Those changes will have huge consequences on card/driver stability. It
> > should have been debated here before.
> > > Moreover windows drivers do those writes, and adding them solved a lot
> > of stability issues in prism54.
> >
> > 1) Well, many months ago, it was talked about
>
> I do not remember these register writes being disabled being discussed
> here. This needs further investigation. I believe more people are going
> to be affected by removing it than adding it, not sure though. We should
> figure out exactly what is meant by "legacy" devices and see if we can
> detect this on the code itself.
>
> Luis
>
> --
> GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
> _______________________________________________
> Prism54-devel mailing list
> Prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://prism54.org/mailman/listinfo/prism54-devel
--
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
|