netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Openswan dev] IPComp

To: Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Openswan dev] IPComp
From: Dominique Blas <ml@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 13:45:10 +0200
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "D. Hugh Redelmeier" <hugh@xxxxxxxxxx>, <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Html: text/html
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407031301460.27704-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: DB
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407031301460.27704-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2
Le samedi 3 Juillet 2004 13:02, Paul Wouters a écrit :
(...)

> 2.6.5 
> 
> He seems to have generic memory problems though, so I don't think this is an 
> openswan or kernel ipsec bug.
No it doesn't seem to be an openswan or kernel ipsec bug. 

Did you all read my mail from this night (0254 am) ?
i explained there that It seems that openswan suffers under poor memory 
conditions whereas when there is plenty of memory everything works 
fine.
I confirm that under these poor memory conditions, using compress=yes limits 
the return packets ( SFS -> OS2) to 348 bytes whereas with compress=no there is 
no such limitation
(but faled memory allocations in this case but not always).
> 
> Paul

Please find in attachment the slabinfo with compress and the slabinfo without 
compress tag in ipsec.conf.


Rgds,

db

Attachment: slabinfo.wcompress
Description: Text document

Attachment: slabinfo.wocompress
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>