| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CodingStyle: while ((a=b)) |
| From: | "chas williams (contractor)" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:07:08 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:25:04 PDT." <20040627012504.GB14444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <20040627012504.GB14444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Chris Wedgwood writes:
>I'm not sure this has ever been a problem in the past has it?
as a counter example, tired eyes (and the compiler!) cant tell
the difference between:
while ((a = b))
if ((a = b))
and
while ((a == b))
if ((a == b))
so i just tend to shy away from assignments in conditions.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CodingStyle: while ((a=b)), Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] further forcedeth updates, Manfred Spraul |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CodingStyle: while ((a=b)), Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: fix sparse checker warnings, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |