| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [NAT-T] NON-IKE encapsulation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:46:54 -0700 |
| Cc: | agruen@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040624123603.GA1241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040624123603.GA1241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:36:03 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm having trouble understanding why we need to increase alen by > two bytes for NON-IKE. As far as I can see it's adding two bytes > of random data to the end of the packet. Is there something > obvious that I'm missing? It is intentional as far as I remember. If it's any other length, then the other side implementing this non-IKE encap stuff won't accept the packet, it must be that length. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 4/4] pkt_sched.h warning fixes, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [no subject], mxrucwjlcmiw |
| Previous by Thread: | [NAT-T] NON-IKE encapsulation, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [NAT-T] NON-IKE encapsulation, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |