Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC

netdev

Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC

To:	"Eble, Dan" <DanE@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:32:24 +0200
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C060DFCD9697A842B3189B458524FDC205D2DE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Dan Eble's message of "Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:24:26 -0400")
References:	<C060DFCD9697A842B3189B458524FDC205D2DE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

"Eble, Dan" <DanE@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Are you sure that is a good idea?  Using separate numbers for Cisco and FR
> is a safeguard against unwittingly creating an FR PVC with "sethdlc cisco
> proto ether ... ".  Or are you suggesting to merge the sethdlc syntax too?

Almost. FR has DLCI, Cisco HDLC doesn't. This would result in small
syntax and code differences.

I have to investigate this a little further. For 2.6 I'd go with ~ your
patch.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Dan Eble Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa RE: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Eble, Dan Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa <=

Previous by Date:	Re: TCP receiver's window calculation problem, John Heffner
Next by Date:	[RFC] How to implement wccp over gre tunnel ?, Paul P Komkoff Jr
Previous by Thread:	RE: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Eble, Dan
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 4 2.6.7-bk6] pcnet32: acknowledge all interrupts early., Don Fry
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]