Re: [PATCH] [sparse] rtentry->rt_dev is _

netdev

Re: [PATCH] [sparse] rtentry->rt_dev is __user

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] [sparse] rtentry->rt_dev is __user
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:09:46 -0700
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20040622155453.564ede17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20040622155453.564ede17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:54:53 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The device entry in the route ioctl's needs annotation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>

Applied.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] [sparse] rtentry->rt_dev is __user, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] [sparse] rtentry->rt_dev is __user, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [RFT] convert syskonnect gigabit ether driver to PCI module interface, Jeff Garzik
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] [sparse] ip_rt_ioctl argument is user pointer, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] [sparse] rtentry->rt_dev is __user, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] [sparse] ip_rt_ioctl argument is user pointer, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]