| To: | jt@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:10:34 -0400 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxx>, sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx, jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040617190049.GC32216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1087377197.25912.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D08769.3070106@xxxxxxx> <20040616204248.GA23617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0BD5B.201@xxxxxxxxx> <20040616223316.GA29618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0D265.3070804@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617174717.GA30460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1E185.2010201@xxxxxxxxx> <40D1E24C.8090802@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617115156.14c946b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040617190049.GC32216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 |
Jean Tourrilhes wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:51:56AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:Remember the API for applications (netlink) doesn't need to be the same as the driver interface (wireless_ops). That is the whole point of having a common core layer. Nod... here's hoping others are checking out out too.As Stephen points out, though, the driver interface redesign is separate from the use of netlink.
Jeff
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.7-rc3: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun0 to become free. Usage count = 1, Alexey Kuznetsov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.7-rc3: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun0 to become free. Usage count = 1, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |