netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink

To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink
From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:00:49 -0700
Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxx>, sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx, jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx
E-mail: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040617115156.14c946b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto
References: <1087377197.25912.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D08769.3070106@xxxxxxx> <20040616204248.GA23617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0BD5B.201@xxxxxxxxx> <20040616223316.GA29618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0D265.3070804@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617174717.GA30460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1E185.2010201@xxxxxxxxx> <40D1E24C.8090802@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617115156.14c946b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:51:56AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
> Remember the API for applications (netlink) doesn't need to be the same as
> the driver interface (wireless_ops).  That is the whole point of having
> a common core layer.

        Stephen : we have been there since 2001. Check the RtNetlink
patch on my web page, it allows full access to all wireless extensions
through netlink without having to modify a single driver.
        Have fun...

        Jean

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>