[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics

To: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:57:23 -0700
Cc: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040607212804.GA17012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040607212804.GA17012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:28:04 +0200
Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What is the correct response if a user passes ethtool speed or duplex
> arguments while autoneg is on? Some possible answers are:
> a) Yell at the user for doing something stupid.
> b) Fail silently (i.e. ignore command).
> c) Change advertised value accordingly and initiate new negotiation.
> d) Consider "autoneg off" implied, force media accordingly.
> The ethtool(8) man page I'm looking at doesn't address that question. The
> actual behavior I've seen is b) which is by far my least preferred
> solution.

speed and duplex fields should be silently ignored in this case

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>