| To: | Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?b4Db3tL |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 May 2004 14:43:33 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040531122608.GR24955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040530151434.GE24955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16571.9006.703294.10134@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040531122608.GR24955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Daniel Stone writes:
> gc_min_interval was zero - should this increase, or what?.
If I remember correctly this was an artifact when used by /proc. Try to
set this value via source and avoid /proc for this. In 2.6 it's something
like:
int ip_rt_gc_min_interval = HZ / 2;
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?b4Db3tL, Daniel Stone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?, Daniel Stone |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?b4Db3tL, Daniel Stone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?, Daniel Stone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |