| To: | Ray Cole <ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6 |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 May 2004 13:28:14 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040525230831.4747005f.ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:08:31PM -0500 |
| References: | <20040524210148.2172d684.ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040525091915.A12162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040525230831.4747005f.ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Ray Cole <ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] > Once I changed this it started working great. I picked up on this when > I noticed it was only sending 64 packets then failing. I looked for > differences in the way 2.6.5 and 2.6.6 handled a full transmit ring and > this line looked suspicious...I figure it is perhaps a difference in the > compiler I'm using (2.95.3) vs what others using this module are > using...perhaps? I would not bet against it :o) Can you: - send me your 2.6.5 and vanilla 2.6.6 .o file compiled under 2.95.3 - try 2.6.6 on a different compiler (2.95.2 excluded) ? Thank you for the analysis. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6, Luis R. Rodriguez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [MailServer Notification]To Sender virus found and action taken., Administrator |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6] TBF: do not oops when user tries to attach/show filter, Dmitry Torokhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |