| To: | Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 May 2004 00:40:45 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040524072657.GC27177@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040524072657.GC27177@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:58 +1000 Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The tg3 transmit code assumes that tg3_tx() will never have to clean > up part of an skb queued for transmit. This assumption is wrong; Greg, perhaps my reading of the tg3 chip docs is different from yours. The hardware is NEVER supposed to do this. Or is there an errata in some chip versions? I've never triggered that BUG() assertion on any of my hardware, ever. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx, Greg Banks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx, Greg Banks |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx, Greg Banks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx, Greg Banks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |