| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BK-PATCH 2.4] IPV6: ensure to evaluate checksum |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 May 2004 08:14:21 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040520.193312.19702393.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040520.193312.19702393.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 20 May 2004 19:33:12 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Following changesets fixes checksum for rawv6 sockets. > - don't receive packets with incorrect checksum I notice now how ipv6 RAW behaves differently here than ipv4 RAW. In ipv4, packet is accepted regardless of checksum correctness. I can see both advantages and disadvantages of this behavior. But what I want to ask is if ipv6 RAW is being different on purpose, for example does the ipv6 advanced API specify this perhaps? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: TxDescriptors -> 1024 default. Please not for every NIC!, Luis R. Rodriguez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BK-PATCH 2.6] IPV6: Fix checksum for rawv6 sockets, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [BK-PATCH 2.4] IPV6: ensure to evaluate checksum, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BK-PATCH 2.4] IPV6: ensure to evaluate checksum, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |