Re: PATCH: bonding might sleep with lock held

[Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 13 May 2004 11:44:45 -0700
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>       It will race against the timers, although I don't see anything
> in there offhand that would conflict.  It just feels somehow unclean to
> do it without the lock.

Why should the timers care if there can be a packet received from the 
network or not?  (this is all what dev_remove_pack prevents) 

-Andi