netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?

To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?
From: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:08:01 +1000
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16571.10357.391130.128260@robur.slu.se>
References: <20040530151434.GE24955@fooishbar.org> <16571.9006.703294.10134@robur.slu.se> <20040531122608.GR24955@fooishbar.org> <16571.10357.391130.128260@robur.slu.se>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:43:33PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:
> Daniel Stone writes:
>  > gc_min_interval was zero - should this increase, or what?.
> 
>  If I remember correctly this was an artifact when used by /proc. Try to 
>  set this value via source and avoid /proc for this. In 2.6 it's something 
>  like:
> 
>  int ip_rt_gc_min_interval    = HZ / 2;

This appears to already be the case, in 2.4.23's net/ipv4/route.c, at
any rate.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                              <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_,
available by the Info system." -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>