| To: | Horst von Brand <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here... |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:15:21 +0200 |
| Cc: | Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200404221738.i3MHcg7J005234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Horst von Brand's message of "Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:42 -0400") |
| References: | <200404221738.i3MHcg7J005234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Horst von Brand <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If everybody (or at least the bigger knots) filters spoofed traffic, > this ceases to be a problem. And that solves a shipload of other > problems, so... There isn't much incentive to deploy filters so that other people don't suffer. So it takes a long time until it's almost universally implemented. (We catch less backscatter from DDoS attacks than a few years ago, so the situation may actually be improving.) -- Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: nf_unregister_hook crashing kernel, Krishna Kumar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Sridhar Samudrala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Horst von Brand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |