| To: | root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here... |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:28:01 -0700 |
| Cc: | pochini@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0404220734330.8039@chaos> |
| References: | <XFMail.20040422102359.pochini@xxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0404220734330.8039@chaos> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
"Richard B. Johnson" <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Has anybody checked to see what Linux does if it receives a
> RST to the broadcast address? It would be a shame if all
> connections were dropped!
int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
...
if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST)
goto discard_it;
Packets which are multicast or broadcast do not get marked
as "PACKET_HOST".
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Horst von Brand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IMQ / new Dummy device post., syrius . ml |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Willy Tarreau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |