| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] fix arm/etherh.c allocation |
| From: | Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:33:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | daniel.ritz@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <40873BEA.1040208@xxxxxxxxx>; from jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx on Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:42PM -0400 |
| References: | <200404202049.09130.daniel.ritz@xxxxxx> <40873BEA.1040208@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:42PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Daniel Ritz wrote: > > --- 1.23/drivers/net/arm/etherh.c Wed Apr 14 12:23:55 2004 > > +++ edited/etherh.c Tue Apr 20 20:39:04 2004 > > > can one of you resend something that applies with 'patch -sp1'? I've noticed this as well - I just end up fixing the patch headers manually. It's a BK bug unfortunately - if you provide a directory for bk diffs, it messes up like above, but if you give explicit files it doesn't. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | how data travels across tcp stack?, Parag Nemade |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here..., Giuliano Pochini |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fix arm/etherh.c allocation, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/8 2.4.26-bk1] pcnet32 whitespace only changes, Don Fry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |