netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] fix arm/etherh.c allocation

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix arm/etherh.c allocation
From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:33:42 +0100
Cc: daniel.ritz@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <40873BEA.1040208@xxxxxxxxx>; from jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx on Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:42PM -0400
References: <200404202049.09130.daniel.ritz@xxxxxx> <40873BEA.1040208@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:42PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > --- 1.23/drivers/net/arm/etherh.c   Wed Apr 14 12:23:55 2004
> > +++ edited/etherh.c Tue Apr 20 20:39:04 2004
> 
> 
> can one of you resend something that applies with 'patch -sp1'?

I've noticed this as well - I just end up fixing the patch headers
manually.  It's a BK bug unfortunately - if you provide a directory
for bk diffs, it messes up like above, but if you give explicit files
it doesn't.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>