netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [LARTC] FWD IMQ mail on netdev

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] FWD IMQ mail on netdev
From: Martin Volf <mv@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:41:57 +0200
In-reply-to: <407B9ABF.60101@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <407B9ABF.60101@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
> ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> -----
> 
> Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to
>       2.6
> From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
..
> I finally hacked dummy device as a good replacement (IMO) for IMQ.
> I am only subscribed to netdev so if there are other lists which
> are of interest to this subject please forward on, but make sure
> responses make it to netdev.
..
> What am i looking for?
..
> 2) testing of the above by people who use IMQ

Hello,

I would like to test your patch. Can you please point me to the place,
from which it can be downloaded? I have a terrible experience with
Patrick McHardy's IMQ on NATing firewalls (kernel panics randomly etc)
and a very good experience with the very same IMQ on an ethernet bridge
(rock solid for one year).

I can share the results of the test with netdev ml.

Thanks!

-- 
Martin Volf



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [LARTC] FWD IMQ mail on netdev, Martin Volf <=