| To: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:05:41 -0800 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul McKenney <Paul.McKenney@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <406B2828.7070800@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <20040331112839.02e8d4c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406B2828.7070800@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:20:56 -0800 Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > The IP forwarding rules, uses rwlock when it could use RCU. > > Don't know if this would help or hurt the recent discussions about > > large rulesets and DOS attacks. > > > > Also, it increases the size of fib_rule slightly. > > Stephen, > > Any benchmarks or perf tests that quantify the gain here? No, don't have enough rules or load in this area to cause an impact. But also, I don't have the test environment to really stress this (ie 1000's of rules). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fealnx oopses, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |