| To: | jt@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux/802_11.h header |
| From: | Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:23:46 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040330215128.GA13891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403301514080.7498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040330215128.GA13891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > Does anybody know who wrote 802_11.h, whether it's deprecated, and if not, > > why it's not used? > > Why don't you ask Simon directly ? Because my question is not why atmel_cs uses a header it doesn't need (the answer would be likely "oops" or "just in case"). My question is why we have two headers for the same purpose in the kernel and what are we going to do with the header that is not used. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: route cache DoS testing and softirqs, Andrea Arcangeli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linux/802_11.h header, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linux/802_11.h header, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux/802_11.h header, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |