| To: | "m k" <mk_26@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux TCP implementation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:28:58 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <BAY15-F28psNhnM7kl300089ffe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <BAY15-F28psNhnM7kl300089ffe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
[ Post stuff like this to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx or linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, most net developers do not read linux-kernel, thanks. ] On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:58:46 +0000 "m k" <mk_26@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also, if the snd_cwnd is maintained in terms of packets and > snd_ssthresh > and > snd_cwnd_clamp is maintained in terms of bytes, how come the comparison > between them. All of the congestion variables are maintained in terms of packets. The function you quote, tcp_cong_avoid(), determines if we increase the congestion window exponentially (when snd_cwnd is less than or equal to snd_ssthresh) or linearlly (when snd_cwnd is more than snd_ssthresh). This is bog-standard Van Jacobson congestion avoidance, nothing fancy. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | NETLINK upcalls and wireless events, Pavlin Radoslavov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4/2.6] ipvs: improve conn rehashing, other fixes, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | NETLINK upcalls and wireless events, Pavlin Radoslavov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New ARPHRD type, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |