| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] packet delay scheduler |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 22 Mar 2004 08:40:07 -0500 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040319142112.0ad562fe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040316174134.2f1da12a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040318120451.1c9ee286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1079707927.1032.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040319142112.0ad562fe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 17:21, David S. Miller wrote: > But for now we can put Stephen's delay scheduler in the tree, and I > don't see any real problem with that until your tc action changes > are ready for integration. Absolutely - sorry intent was just to motivate not reject. I would say the extension patches are ready for inclusion but we can take that offline. I have a few people testing them under more rigorous conditions at the moment. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Kernel 2.4.25 + VLAN + CBQ disc broken ?, Gianfranco Delli Carri |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | NETLINK upcalls and wireless events, Pavlin Radoslavov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] packet delay scheduler, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |